WordPress.com
Commercial Appraiser @AppraiserCommer 14
Dec 2014
More
YOUR COMMERCIAL APPRAISER / FORENSIC CONSULTANT
#commercialappraiser,
#cre,
#realestate,
#appraiser,
310.337.197
From: LAW OF THE LAND <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 4:07 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [New post] NY Appellate Court Reverses Dismissal of Complaint in Enforcement Matter Involving a Secondhand Retail Operation
Patricia Salkin posted: "This post was authored by Matthew Loeser, Esq. Defendant owned real property in the Village of Sharon Springs, Schoharie County. Plaintiff became aware
that defendant was operating a secondhand retail operation on the property in violation of the Village"
Respond to this post by replying above this line
New post on
LAW OF THE LAND
NY
Appellate Court Reverses Dismissal of Complaint in Enforcement Matter Involving a Secondhand Retail Operation
by
Patricia Salkin
This post was authored by Matthew Loeser, Esq.
Defendant owned real property in the Village of Sharon Springs, Schoharie County. Plaintiff became aware that defendant was operating a secondhand retail operation on the property
in violation of the Village of Sharon Springs Zoning Law and that conditions on the property violated the property maintenance provisions of the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code. After Defendant failed to remedy these violations, plaintiff
commenced this action seeking injunctive relief directing defendant to correct the problems, as well as the assessment of civil penalties, costs and disbursements against him. Plaintiff moved for summary judgment, and despite receiving no opposition to its
motion, the Supreme Court of New York denied the motion and dismissed the complaint, finding it “impossible” to discern a cause of action in that pleading.
On appeal, the court found that plaintiff established the material facts through an affidavit by its Code and Zoning Enforcement Officer, who detailed the zoning and building code
violations found on defendant’s property and averred that defendant had not remedied them after being served with orders to do so. The statements in the affidavit were corroborated by documentary and photographic evidence, and defendant submitted no opposition
that might have raised material questions of fact. Thus, the evidence in the record substantiated plaintiff’s entitlement to the relief sought, which was narrowed in its notice of motion for summary judgment and there was no indication that defendant was prejudiced
by the failure to identify the statutes authorizing it sooner. Accordingly, the court granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and remitted the case so that Supreme Court could fashion an appropriate remedial order.
Village of Sharon Springs v Barr, 2018 WL 5046723 (NYAD 3 Dept. 10/18/2018)
Patricia Salkin
| October 24, 2018 at 7:06 pm | Categories:
Current Caselaw - New York,
Enforcement,
Uncategorized | URL:
https://wp.me/p64kE-34S
Comment
See
all comments
Like
Unsubscribe
to no longer receive posts from LAW OF THE LAND.
Change your email settings at
Manage Subscriptions.
Trouble clicking?
Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
https://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/2018/10/24/ny-appellate-court-reverses-dismissal-of-complaint-in-enforcement-matter-involving-a-secondhand-retail-operation/
Thanks for flying with
WordPress.com
commercial appraiser, commercial appraisal, commercial appraiser la
Comments