Latest Case This Week: Johnson v. Wells Fargo Bank Nat'l Ass'n (Supreme Court of Nevada)

  Commercial Appraiser
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
Curtis D. Harris, BS, CGREA, REB
310.337.1973 (Cell,) 310.251.3959 (Text)
Commercial Appraiser 
From: Banking Law - Justia Weekly Opinion Summaries
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 6:06 AM
To: Commercial Appraiser
Subject: Latest Case This Week: Johnson v. Wells Fargo Bank Nat'l Ass'n (Supreme Court of Nevada)
 

Free Banking case summaries from Justia.
If you are unable to see this message, click here to view it in a web browser.
To ensure delivery to your inbox, please add [email protected] to your address book.
Justia Daily Opinion Summaries is a FREE service.Subscribe to summaries of US appellate court opinions at Daily.Justia.comPractice area emails with summaries from all reviewed courts are sent weekly.Licensed attorneys with Justia profiles may log in to annotate Justia appellate case law.You May FREELY Redistribute This E-Mail in Whole.Today on Verdict
Religion in the 2016 Election Cycle: Where Did It Go?
Marci A. Hamilton
Marci Hamilton, a Fox Distinguished Scholar in the Program for Research on Religion at the University of Pennsylvania, discusses the decreased emphasis on affiliation with organized religion this election cycle. Read Article
Weekly Opinion SummariesBanking
Weekly Summaries Distributed September 30, 2016
· Johnson v. Wells Fargo Bank Nat'l Ass'n
Banking
Supreme Court of Nevada Receive this and other FREE daily opinion summaries from Justia
Johnson v. Wells Fargo Bank Nat'l Ass'nCourt: Supreme Court of Nevada Citation: 132 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 70 Opinion Date: September 29, 2016 Areas of Law: Banking Appellant opened three business accounts at Respondent Wells Fargo Bank. Respondent later unilaterally closed the three accounts, stating that the reason for the closure was because Appellant had been involved in a criminal activity. Appellant filed a complaint alleging defamation, false light, and declaratory relief. Appellant then filed a motion to compel Respondent to produce documents regarding the closure of her accounts, as well as the risk assessment processes and analysis for closing these accounts. The discovery commissioner decided that Respondent was not required to provide the requested records under the Bank Secrecy Act. The district court affirmed the commissioner’s report and recommendations but ordered Respondent to provide a privilege log concerning the subject matter at issue. After Respondent submitted a privilege log, the discovery commissioner recommended that the documents be deemed confidential. The district court affirmed and adopted the report and recommendations. Appellant’s cause of action for declaratory relief was ultimately dismissed by the district court. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the discovery commissioner and the district court did not err in concluding that the documents at issue were protected by the Suspicious Activity Report privilege under the Bank Secrecy Act. http://j.st/46ug View Case On: Justia Google Scholar
Justia has an unparalleled track record of helping lawyers & law firms grow their practices with online marketing. Contact us today to learn more about how we can help you turn your website into an effective marketing tool. Call Us (888) 587-8421 or Contact Us. Forward to a FriendHave friends who like law? Forward this email.Find Us on FacebookLike Justia and enjoy legal discussions on Facebook.Follow Us on TwitterFollow Justiacom for news and updates on Twitter.Justia.com Free Legal Information Portalwww.Justia.comFederal & State Case Law, Codes & RegsLaw.Justia.comUS Federal Case Filings & DocketsDockets.Justia.comDaily Opinion SummariesDaily.Justia.comYou received this email because you have subscribed to Justia Daily Opinion Summaries. You can subscribe to summaries for US Courts, including the US Supreme Court, all US Courts of Appeals and some US state courts.Visit the Justia Daily Opinion Summaries page to add, edit or remove subscriptions.If you are experiencing problems with this newsletter, please email our tech support team at [email protected] From This Newsletteror unsubscribe [email protected] from all newsletters immediately here."Justia" is a registered trademark of Justia Inc.
Justia • Justia, Inc. 1380 Pear Ave Suite 2B Mountain View, CA 94043 USAHave a Happy Day!Hug the Pug© 2011-2016, Justia Inc.