Thanks!
Curtis D. Harris, BS, CGREA, REB
Bachelor of Science in Real Estate, CSULA
Associate of Arts in Architecture, LACC
State Certified General Appraiser
Real Estate Broker
ASTM E-2018 Commercial Real Estate Inspector
HUD 203k Repair/Rehab Consultant
HUD/FHA Real Estate Appraiser/Reviewer
FannieMae REO Consultant
CTAC LEED Certification
The Harris Company, Forensic Appraisers and Real Estate Consultants
*PIRS/Harris Company and the Science of Real Estate-Partners*
630 North Sepulveda Boulevard, Suite 9A
El Segundo, CA. 90245
310-337-1973 Office
310-251-3959 Cell
WebSite: http://www.harriscompanyrec.com
Resume: http://harriscompanyrec.com/commercialappraiser.pdf
Commercial Appraiser Blog: http://harriscompanyrec.com/blog/
IT'S THE LAW-Designation Discrimination is Illegal [FIRREA, Sec. 564.6]: Professional Association Membership http://www.orea.ca.gov/html/fed_regs.shtml#Statement7 Membership in an appraisal organization: A State Certified General Appraiser may not be excluded from consideration for an assignment for a federally related transaction by virtue of membership or lack of membership in any particular appraisal organization, including the appraisal institute.
CONFIDENTIALITY/PRIVILEGE NOTICE: This transmission and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee. The information contained in this transmission is confidential in nature and protected from further use or disclosure under U.S. Pub. L. 106-102, 113 U.S. Stat. 1338 (1999), and may be subject to consultant/appraiser-client or other legal privilege. Your use or disclosure of this information for any purpose other than that intended by its transmittal is strictly prohibited and may subject you to fines and/or penalties under federal and state law. If you are not the intended recipient of this transmission, please destroy all copies received and confirm destruction to the sender via return transmittal.
Subject: Landlord - Tenant Distributed July 31, 2015
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 13:11:43 +0000
Landlord - Tenant Distributed July 31, 2015
If you are unable to see this message,
click here
to view it in a web browser.
To ensure delivery to your inbox, please add
[email protected]
to your address book.
Justia Daily Opinion Summaries is a FREE service.
Subscribe to summaries of US appellate court opinions at Daily.Justia.com
Practice area emails with summaries from all reviewed courts are sent weekly.
You May FREELY Redistribute This E-Mail in Whole.
Today on Verdict
The Prospects for Presidential Election Reform as the 2016 Campaign Season Gets Underway
Vikram David Amar
Law professor and dean designate of the University of Illinois College of Law Vikram David Amar provides an update on the so-called National Popular Vote (NPV) interstate compact plan in light of the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision in Arizona Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission. Read Article
Weekly Opinion Summaries
Landlord - Tenant
Weekly Summaries Distributed July 31, 2015
Velez v. Cuyahoga Metro. Hous. Auth.
Landlord - Tenant, Public Benefits, Real Estate & Property Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Receive this and other FREE daily opinion summaries from Justia
Velez v. Cuyahoga Metro. Hous. Auth.
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Docket: 14-3978
Opinion Date:
July 30, 2015
Areas of Law:
Landlord - Tenant, Public Benefits, Real Estate & Property Law
The Section 8 low-income housing assistance voucher program, 42 U.S.C. 1437f(o), is administered by public housing agencies such as Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority (CMHA). Program regulations define “rent to [the] owner” as “[t]he total monthly rent payable to the owner under the lease for the unit. Rent to owner covers payment for any housing services, maintenance and utilities that the owner is required to provide and pay for.” Velez and Hatcher, voucher recipients, entered into one-year leases with K&D. The leases provide: “If Resident(s) shall holdover after the end of the term of this Rental Agreement, said holdover shall be deemed a tenancy of month to month and applicable month to month fees shall apply.” Velez entered into a month-to-month tenancy after her one-year term expired; Hatcher entered into month-to-month tenancies, and, later, a nine-month agreement. K&D charged fees of $35.00 to $100.00 per month. CMHA did not treat these short-term rental fees as rent under the voucher program. Velez and Hatcher were required to pay the fees and filed suit under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The court granted CMHA summary judgment, holding that the fees were not rent. The Sixth Circuit reversed. Recasting the charge as a short-term fee, rather than rent, does not change that it is consideration paid by the tenant for use of the rental unit.
View Case On:
Justia
Google Scholar
Forward to a Friend
Have friends who like law? Forward this email.
Find Us on Facebook
Like Justia and enjoy legal discussions on Facebook.
Follow Us on Twitter
Follow Justiacom for news and updates on Twitter.
Justia.com Free Legal Information Portal
Federal & State Case Law, Codes & Regs
Law.Justia.com
US Federal Case Filings & Dockets
Dockets.Justia.com
Daily Opinion Summaries
Daily.Justia.com
You received this email because you have subscribed to Justia Daily Opinion Summaries. You can subscribe to summaries for US Courts, including the US Supreme Court, all US Courts of Appeals and some US state courts.
Visit the Justia Daily Opinion Summaries page to add, edit or remove subscriptions.
If you are experiencing problems with this newsletter, please email our tech support team at [email protected].
Unsubscribe From This Newsletter
or unsubscribe [email protected] immediately here.
"Justia" is a registered trademark of Justia Inc.
Justia • Justia, Inc.
1380 Pear Ave
Suite 2B
Mountain View, CA 94043
USA
Have a Happy Day!
Hug the Pug
© 2011-2015, Justia Inc.
commercial appraiser, commercial appraisal, commercial appraiser la
Comments